Mr Lundt
-
The Basics
-
Mr on Patch
-
More Stuff
Comments
-
On the Blog Post From Government Dependence to True Independence
-
On the Blog Post From Government Dependence to True Independence
Mr Lundt
3:54 pm on Monday, May 20, 2013
@randy 'Are you saying that everyone on 'welfare' is committing fraud?"
"Now those support services are under attack, as if we've made life too cushy for the working poor."The easiest sign of a vapid argument, is when you being the argument with such an absurd premise. You embarrass a cause that actually has validity.
The fact that you are not willing to have the discussion with someone who disagrees with you is fascinating and shows the depth of your knowledge base..
You have a stream of idiotic statements that are childish straw men. I guess it is easier that actually addressing an issue. -
On the Blog Post From Government Dependence to True Independence
Mr Lundt
3:54 pm on Monday, May 20, 2013
@randy 'Are you saying that everyone on 'welfare' is committing fraud?"
The easiest sign of a vapid argument, is when you being the argument with such an absurd premise. You embarrass a cause that actually has validity.
The fact that you are not willing to have the discussion with someone who disagrees with you is fascinating and shows the depth of your knowledge base..
-
On the Blog Post From Government Dependence to True Independence
Mr Lundt
2:03 pm on Monday, May 20, 2013
ReplyRandy your grasp of welfare fraud is as clear as your grasp on the benevolent , transparent Obama administration.
Thanks for vomiting back up the talking points of the victim class.
-
On the article Bonkers For Baseball? Post Your Passion on Patch!
Mr Lundt
10:34 am on Monday, May 20, 2013
ReplyI would rather go to the Timber Rattlers game, get much better seats, save a ton of money, and see better effort.
-
On the article Would a Lower OWI Threshold Make Wisconsin Safer?
Mr Lundt
7:57 am on Monday, May 20, 2013
@ Howard
"The difference between .05 and .08 might allow a police officer to take action against these drivers after only one drink. In other words, "If you drink at all, I will bust you.""At least we know where you stand. I suggest that this is untenable and unacceptable but at least you have the courage to clearly articulate your feelings.
We disagree on many levels---but to your credit you are honest and forthright. I may not agree with your opinion but I certainly can respect a person who calls it honestly and with reasoned thought.
-
On the article Would a Lower OWI Threshold Make Wisconsin Safer?
Mr Lundt
7:59 am on Monday, May 20, 2013
@Howard
At least we know where you stand. I suggest that this is untenable and unacceptable but at least you have the courage to clearly articulate your feelings.We disagree on many levels---but to your credit you are honest and forthright. I may not agree with your opinion but I certainly can respect a person who calls it honestly and with reasoned thought.
-
On the article Would a Lower OWI Threshold Make Wisconsin Safer?
Mr Lundt
3:35 pm on Sunday, May 19, 2013
Robert start off suggesting it is the state of Wisconsin and accuses us of not doing our research when apparently Mr. "Low information" himself found out that:
The National Transportation Safety Board recommended that all states drop the blood-alcohol level at which motorists can be charged with driving drunk to .05, down from the current rate of .08 that all 50 states impose. The threshold is a matter of state law, but the federal government can pressure states to meet its standard by threatening to withhold highway funding.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/05/14/feds-recommend-lower-drunken-driving-threshold/#ixzz2Tlvr0h5j
This is the Obama administration 100%
-
On the article Would a Lower OWI Threshold Make Wisconsin Safer?
Mr Lundt
3:36 pm on Sunday, May 19, 2013
ROber start off suggesting it is the state of Wisooinsin and accuses us of not doing our research when apparently Mr "Low information found out that:
The National Transportation Safety Board recommended that all states drop the blood-alcohol level at which motorists can be charged with driving drunk to .05, down from the current rate of .08 that all 50 states impose. The threshold is a matter of state law, but the federal government can pressure states to meet its standard by threatening to withhold highway funding.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/05/14/feds-recommend-lower-drunken-driving-threshold/#ixzz2Tlvr0h5j
This is the Obama administration 100%
-
On the article Would a Lower OWI Threshold Make Wisconsin Safer?
Mr Lundt
1:41 pm on Sunday, May 19, 2013
@KKP
The problem is you are redefining excess to .05. You are not talking any dangerous drivers off the roads but you are penalizing other people.
Mr Lundt
10:28 pm on Monday, May 20, 2013
Grow up randy
I described your arguments 100% accurately. I never called you a name. I did suggest that you did not have a clear grasp of the facts based on the fact that your arguments were based on absurd straw men and I illustrated those for you.
Here is a thought---stop creating such absurd straw man arguments. Then people won't be so offended by your tone.