patching...
Breaking: Sussex House Fire Causes $130,000 in Damage »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices
The aggressive progressive and boring guy next door, all in one...

What's White, Crusty, Full of Holes And Aging Quickly? ~ The GOP

What's White, Crusty, Full of Holes And Aging Quickly? No, it's not that piece of Swiss cheese you dropped on the kitchen floor last week and have refused to pick up. It's not Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell (well, he is all of the above).

It's the targeted demographic of the Republican party.

The GOP swept the white vote on Tuesday, but got their old white butts handed to them by the growing number of Latino, minority and women voters. Latinos went for Obama by 70%, African Americans by 95%, women by 57%. Now the question remains Why can't the Republican party attract these growing demographics?

Does the GOP attract racists? Is it the fact that instead of focusing on how to win Virginia, they were focused on controlling women's vaginas? Is it because they think a woman should pay more for health care because she has a uterus? Is it because they think a woman, who pays more for health care because she has a uterus, should also get paid less at her job because she had to miss time off of work to raise a child in which she had to have because Republicans passed laws that made it more expensive or illegal for her to prevent or terminate her pregnancy? Is it because the GOP tried to pass laws making it more difficult for people in the inner cities, people with disabilities and the elderly to cast a ballot? Is it because the GOP took a hard-line, mean-spirited approach to Hispanic-Americans and think they should use "self-deportation?" Is it because their nominee thinks 47% of us are moochers?

It's likely all of the above . . . The white population shrunk by 2% from 2008 while the Latino population grew by 2%. This trend will continue in the future. Florida is trending more Hispanic and more Democratic, as is New Mexico, Colorado, Georgia and yes, soon even Texas will fall as a GOP stronghold as the Hispanic population continues to grow.

Let's also look at the fact that the younger population still STRONGLY favors a Democratic ticket because of their socially progressive stances on womens' rights, gay rights and so on and so on... and the liberal youth of today, who think nothing of gay marriage and sexual equality will not simply fall off the face of the Earth, but instead continue to vote, and in larger percentages.

The phrase, "It's the economy stupid," should be replaced with the phrases, "Son los cambios demográficos estúpido," or "Es mi útero estúpido," or "Son mis derechos constitucionales estúpido," or "Take your stinking paws off of my rights you damn dirty SOBs."

There are plenty of reasons why Mitt Romney lost FOUR of the states which he was a resident of to President Obama (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Michigan and California) but it was really the GOP's regressive and insulting stances on social issues that cost them this election.

There is also the fact that there have been 359 GOP FILIBUSTERS since 2006, all but bringing the economy to a screeching hault in their attempt to make Obama a loser in this election. The GOP blocked everything they could: Jobs bills, more jobs bills, and yeah, more jobs bills, and stimulus money to return veterans, teachers, firefighters and cops to work for our communities. Instead, the GOP thinks we should all home-school our kids and arm them with a gun and a fire extinguisher to save tax dollars. Brilliant!

The demographics are trending Democratic and progressive, and if the GOP doesn't get their big, old, crusty, white noses out of womens' vaginas, our bedrooms, our marriages and our voting booths, the party will continue to lose followers, as well as national elections.

Bren

2:07 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

The GOP strategists followed polling as much as anyone. I'm certain they knew how this cycle would end early on and focused instead on trying to push the dialogue as far to the right as possible while developing a successful team for 2016. (My guess is Chris Christie-Marco Rubio).

Reply

CowDung

2:57 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I'm thinking that it is the Democratic party that attracts the racists.

People of color didn't vote for the White guy, and Lefty bloggers seem to be putting a lot of focus on the race of the candidates and even use the racial term 'White' as a derogatory adjective.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sally

7:23 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

You are so right!! But if you are a Democrat, it's perfectly fine to be racist.

Greg

3:22 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

So the GOP started filibustering in 2006 so Obama would lose this election???

That was one of the smarter things in this blog, the rest is really stupid.

Reply
Comment_arrow

CowDung

5:04 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

In 2006? Now that's planning ahead--Obama wasn't even elected President until near the end of 2008...

Greg

3:28 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Jason does not seem to mind the big, old, crusty, white noses in his vagina. But you take away the "free stuff" and the GOP would have wiped the floor with the black man.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike in OC

11:44 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

@Greg.... your comment "Jason does not seem to mind the big, old, crusty, white noses in his vagina." seriously made me laugh dude.... that was classic. lol

Bob McBride

4:02 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I gotta sort of agree with Jason on this one. I think had Mitt Romney been allowed to be Mitt Romney, not had to go through the "double down on being hard right" series of run-offs and then been saddled with Paul Ryan, it might have been a different story. The Democrats seem to have the sense to keep most of their most extreme stuff just out of the glare of the klieg lights (granted, easier to do when you don't have to have a primary and intra-party debates) while the Republicans seem to want to fly the freak flag proudly. As for the old white guy rap, perhaps, but there are just as many crusty old white guys who are slipping into that time in life when they're going to be dependent on SS and Medicare and who voted "for their own self interest" even though for some of them it meant biting the bullet and voting for the black guy.

Reply
Comment_arrow

CowDung

4:06 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Actually, it seems that there were 6.6 million fewer White voters this year as compared to the 2008 elections. I'm thinking that a lot of those 'old white guys' didn't vote for Obama--they just didn't vote...

Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

4:09 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Entirely possible. I know last go round my dad's walking buddies at the mall and others he knew were pretty much biting the bullet and voting for Obama out of fear. Since I no longer have any contact with that crowd, you could definitely be right about that.

Comment_arrow

Greg

4:18 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Bob, Do you think Romney would have won if he offered free college education?

Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

4:35 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Unfortunately, anytime you offer something free you increase your chances. Had he done that though, I'm sure Obama would have one-upped him with free college AND a Chevy Volt or some such. He didn't stick his front feet into GM for nothing...

Steve ®

11:29 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Have you ever looked at a county map Jason? I posted one but your blogs rarely allow approval of pictures.

http://i253.photobucket.com/albums/hh44/erwins_photos/2012-usa-election-map-by-county-nyt.png

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike in OC

11:42 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

looks like alot more red than blue

Comment_arrow

Jason Patzfahl

7:17 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

There are only so many "Archie Bunkers" left in this country - those older bigots who tend to vote for regressive social issues...

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

10:37 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

As expected you are truly a piece of work. If you claim to be "A liberal living in suburbia." Jason, you are as YOU describe "those older bigots who tend to vote for regressive social issues"

J. B. Schmidt

12:18 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

So the greatest generation, filled with the largest percentage of old crusty white people, were willing to sacrifice everything during their youth in order that your ability to vote freely was never infringed upon. In response, you write a hate filled blog condemning them for not being more opened minded about the handout you need.

I am betting today they are feeling fulfilled that they sacrificed so much so that your wife would be freed of her contraceptive expense.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jason Patzfahl

7:04 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

By a LARGE majority, women across the country voted in favor of Obama and against old (mostly) rich white dudes in Washington sticking their noses in their vaginas. Sad thing is, if the GOP would have dropped their regressive social views and stuck to fiscal matters, they could have pulled this one out.

The GOP claims to believe in small, unobtrusive government, but yet they want to tell us who we can marry and how we can procreate and stick themselves between us and our doctors and make them perform unnecessary, invasive procedures just to shame pregnant women...

If you and your wife want to pop out a kid every 10 months or continue to use the old "pull & pray" method of birth control fine, but we choose to have a little more control of how many offspring we have by utilizing science.

Comment_arrow

Mike in OC

7:08 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

@JB Schmidt..... I was thinking about that too.... as Veterans Day approaches I can only think of those young men who died in battle and lost the opportunity to become Old and Crusty while fighting for this country.

To all the Vets, young AND old, black AND white, gay AND straight, rich AND poor, abled AND disabled, alive AND especially those who have passed..... I thank you for your service to our country.

Comment_arrow

J. B. Schmidt

7:27 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

@ Jason
He won the single dependent women and government employed woman vote and lost the self sustaining married women vote. The women who must live by a budget that they earn disagree with your gender baiting and course language.

Or Jason, rather then spending time blogging you work an additional 1hr a week and bring home enough money to buy a back of condoms. Unfortunately, you would rather repay the service of our vets by expecting the country they fought for to cover the cost of your care free sex.

Jason Patzfahl

7:13 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

A few side notes on the election:

1) President Obama won 8 of the 10 wealthiest counties in the US (I guess this means they are in favor of paying a higher tax rate)
2) The 18-29 year old demographic voted in favor of Obama with more than 64% of the vote (the future looks bright for the Dems)
3) Paul Ryan lost to challenger Rob Zerban in his home ward, hometown, and his entire county, while Mitt Romney lost in all of his four "home states" (looks like those who knew these clowns the most knew to vote against them).

Reply
Comment_arrow

J. B. Schmidt

7:32 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Excellent, then the country is yours. The layoffs, tax hikes, continuous 8%+ unemployment and lowered condition of healthcare are now owned solely by the Democrats. No more blaming Bush. Its is time for you to accept what happens next is the liberal dream.

Sally

7:26 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Where in the world did you get the idea that ANYONE wants to keep women from using birth control? We just DON'T WANT TO PAY FOR IT--nor should we have to. There is NO inalienable right to have sex! I am embarrassed by all the women who vote with their vaginas instead of their heads.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy1949

11:33 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

The Personhood Amendment, which is written so as to potentially outlaw hormonal contraceptives and the IUD. That's how.

Bob McBride

7:33 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Fan faster, Jason. Lyle's got 117 comments to your 24 (as of right now). You've got a lot of ground to make up.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jay Sykes

8:29 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Who will win the race... to the bottom?

Ed Willing

8:43 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

What's white, wanna-be-racist, antagonistic and immature? Jason Patzfahl.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ed Willing

8:45 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

The only people who ever think of race and never shut up about it are wanna-be's like you. Your party realized racism didn't work anymore in the 60's, and your kind must have felt out of place, and started accusing US of it. lol

How ignorant the left can be.

Carol

9:52 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

MMMMMMM, I think it's the Republicans!! Also have a little mold around the edges. Hey, this is America, so why not forget the parties & just try to solve all the problems peacefully. Everytime there's a Republican president, we get involved in another war. Where are all these countries that we've helped when there's a disaster here like this past hurricane in the East coast??? No one helps us!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bewildered

11:02 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Excuse me. WWI =Woodrow Wilson, WWII=FDR. Vietnam =LBJ (with his Gulf of Tonkin), Kosovo= Clinton. In the future, pls read up on your US military history before embarrassing yourself with such outlandish claims. A little homework would keep you from looking so foolish.

Don Niederfrank

10:19 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

The demographics of the nation are changing. So the agenda of the majority of citizens is changing and will continue to do so. The Democratic party is seen by those who have needed and need individual governmental support as on their side. And when they no longer need that suppose as the party that will provide it for those like them who do.

The GOP is seen as conserving the status quo and providing governmental support to large corporations. When you see yourself as disadvantaged by the status quo b/c of gender, sexual orientation, race, etc. you vote for the party that offers change. When you see yourself as advantaged by the status quo you vote for the party that offers stability.

The conservative myth is that people who voted Democratic did so because they wanted "free stuff", that is, that they wanted something that they did not deserve. The truth is many people voted Democratic because they felt they have been denied what they deserved--not free stuff but fair opportunity at acquiring stuff.

The movement is tectonic in speed and inevitability.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

10:41 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Don, I think you could have pretty much said the same thing in one sentence.

In times of economic instability like we're experiencing now, people who might vote otherwise will tend to vote for the safety net.

It's an understandable, if not completely rational, decision.

Don Niederfrank

10:22 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

"suppose as" should be "support". duh. :)

Reply

Randy1949

10:46 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

The fruits of Socialism taking root. This was all predictable. Obama voters deserve welfare lines anyway.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy1949

11:35 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

And heeeere's Mini-Me again!

Randy1949

11:40 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Jason -- White, crusty and rapidly aging describes me, except for the politics.

Reply

James R Hoffa

12:01 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

OK then - now such a piece of crap blog is definitely expected from the likes of Patzfahl!

But what in the hell is Lyle doing mirroring such a stupid synopsis???

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy1949

12:07 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

@JRH -- At least both Lyle and Jason have comments enabled on their pieces. I wish everybody had the courage to do that.

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

12:51 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

@Randy1949 -

Is there any blog in particular that you're referring to with such a statement?

Hoffa has always had comments enabled on all of his movie related blogs.

Comment_arrow

Randy1949

12:57 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

I was going to say this one: http://brookfield-wi.patch.com/blog_posts/im-sorry-so-sorry

It had been up since yesterday, with no ability to post. She seems to have fixed it now. I'm sure it was just an oversight.

Carol

3:18 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

You guys are acting like a bunch of spoiled kids! This is the problem no one can agree and we all have our opinions. Freedom of speech we are lucky to have, but why can't everyone just get along & pray that we have a peaceful world. Veterans day is almost here, can we just be thankful to all the guys who lost their lives, or lost limbs? How bout those with PTSD, can we feel bad for them? This is America and I'm proud to be an American. Stop this bickering & grow up!!

Reply

Eric

6:37 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

The county-by-county election results at Steve's link above are instructive. Rural less populated American areas consistently vote conservative while densely populated urban areas vote progressive to become more like densely populated counterparts in Europe where governments provide more services. Rural areas embrace more independent self-reliant and equal opportunity ideals America was founded on while urbanites seek the democratic-socialism and equal outcomes of Europeans. Is that progress? More socialism and less capitalism? It is interesting that Europeans after living under monarchs, dictators, and upper class oligarchs into the 19th and 20th centuries, opted democratically to continue with strong centralized governments, but to eliminate their social-class systems by having their new governments provide a myriad of social services to their entire populations. Between socialism and frequent wars among themselves, their economies grew slowly while the US raced ahead. I'm suggesting while the demographics analysis of US election results may have some credence, population distribution also has and continues to be a major factor in how Americans vote. Having lived and studied in Europe, I am convinced that there are things both continents can learn from each other, but abandoning equal opportunity and natural incentives for the ideal of socially guaranteed equality does not appear to achieve "progress".

Almost old and crusty retired military guy.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Don Niederfrank

9:32 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

There are more differences between urban and rural dwellers than those you point out. Rural dwellers tend to have less contact with persons who are different, tend to have a lower education level, a lower income level. There are other differences as well, but those I mention could be used to explain political differences as well.

Re. the growth of U.S. economy, it might be pointed out that the U.S. is bordered by two significantly weaker nations and two oceans. It has one of the largest areas of arable land, significant water ways, mineral and petroleum resources.

It also has a profound mythos of the individual who "goes it alone", is "his own man", etc. manifest in our heroes and in our strong entrepreneurial ethos and widespread optimism.

IOW, the factors you site for both your points might well be relevant, but to make a case that they are primary cause would really difficult without begging the question.

Comment_arrow

Eric

11:26 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Don, I'm sure we could complicate the argument with several more variables, but I would still simply postulate that rural lifestyles have necesssitated that individuals be more self-reliant and this facilitates a conservative outlook. We find less educated low-income people in both rural and urban settings. They tend to vote differently.

Ref growth of the US economy, the US began as a colony of a single European nation, avoided major conflicts with its neighbors, and fought only one civil war. Europe also possesses significant arable land, navigable waterways, and resources, which they have frequently fought over. Given plate tectonics, these two land masses which were once joined ought to be fairly similar.

The US enjoyed the advantage of hybridization early on that brought a variety of peoples, skills, and ideas to its shores. Most of these early immigrants sought opportunity and lived in rural areas where their contributions flourished in an environment that necessitated strong individuals, families, and small communities. Today the hybridization process is called globalization as it affects most continents worldwide through the fast movement of people, ideas, goods, and services across borders. Although we have some resistance to immigration and intermingling here, it pales to what goes on in Europe or East Asia. This US advantage is not by chance, but by political design. US farmers worked their own lands while European elites repeatedly waged war on each other.

Mafia Mike

12:13 am on Saturday, November 10, 2012

It seems to be all black and white to me.

Reply

Leave a comment