Main Street Roundabouts Officially Dead
Every Village Board member came out against the idea of roundabouts on Main Street during Tuesday night’s workshop, a vote that had the close to 100 attendees applauding.
“It’s off the table,” concluded Village President Greg Goetz. “It’s off.”
Goetz is referring to roundabouts, and after every Sussex Village Board member expressed a disinterest in them on Tuesday, the village president ordered architects to kill the idea of roundabouts for Main Street.
The group of officials met on Tuesday evening for the first-ever Main Street construction workshop, held for convenience reasons at the Public Safety Building. And good thing it was; close to 100 concerned residents packed the room and lined the walls waiting for their turn to speak to the board.
However, rather than an endless stream of comments opposing roundabouts, the Village Board was met with something else: applause. Goetz summed up comments from trustees by saying while roundabouts are functional, they’re not for Sussex.
“My opinion as far as the roundabouts go is that they do serve a purpose, but maybe not in Sussex,” Goetz said as the crowd erupted with applause. “The library meeting was very heated, and that’s not where my decision came from at all. This is a small town community. If we want to have our community still stay like a small town, that might not be what we want to do for our community.”
“Since this roundabout saga began, the biggest question people had was, ‘Does anyone on the board have any common sense?’ Guess what? We now know they do.”
Each trustee agreed, saying they want to closely review the enormous packet of public comments collected at each public forum before making any additional concrete decisions. However, both trustees Pat Tetzlaff and Jason Wegner agreed they thought “Concept 1,” the one that most closely resembles Main Street’s current layout, is the concept they find most appealing.
And local business owners that would have been directly affected by the placement of roundabouts had to throw our their prepared statements and list of questions. The owners from Piggly Wiggly and Paul’s Service said they were loaded with questions, but now only can say, “Thank you.”
“I was going to read this whole thing tonight, but I don’t have to now,” said P.J. Cain, owner of Paul’s Service. “Since this roundabout saga began, the biggest question people had was, ‘Does anyone on the board have any common sense?’ Guess what? We now know they do.”
Now that roundabouts are off the table, trustees and community members can begin solving more specific problems with the functionality of the road. For example, many community members opposed rerouting Silver Spring Drive to create a more traditional intersection with Main Street.
Along with rerouting the street, residents were concerned about rerouting traffic away from Main Street, the vitality of businesses on the street and creating a bridge over the railroad near Quad/Graphics.
The next Main Street workshop is scheduled for sometime in June, but no specific date has been identified.
Joseph
9:23 pm on Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Glad to see they actually listened.
Mike B
9:33 pm on Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Man. Y'all are crazy. Round abouts are the future. Sussex will now be stuck in the past for the next 50 years. Heh. Just kidding. I don't really care either way.
I do, however, have concerns about the rerouting of Silver Spring and how that will negatively affect places like the SOS center since there will then be no easy way to get to them. That whole curvey 'S' design just looks so ugly like a snake weaving through the area. Being able to turn left from West Main to Silver Spring really isn't that big of a deal. I've done without it for this long and it's no biggie to just go down 74 and then come up VV from that side. Takes an extra 60 seconds or so when I have to go to the post office. I'd leave it the way it is over screwing everything up down there.
Margee
4:25 am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Amazing! So glad for Paul's and the Pig!
Mike B
7:01 am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
And what's this about a bridge over the train tracks? Where would this go exactly? This is the first I've heard about it.
Joseph
7:10 am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Well, they just spent a ton of money to redo that entire intersection and since the roundabouts are dead, they have to find another thing to spend more money on... There isn't enough room to put a bridge there.
Angie
7:24 am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Aw, I'm sad! I really love them, but I can understand why other ppl don't. Besides, I think the Irish only like them so they can stage protests and shut down streets, and probably they are a huge waste of land, but still the idea of them is fun!
donna hammond
7:46 am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
I am glad the roundabout issue is dead. If the cars never have to stop, how do pedestrians cross the street.
Cthlulu
9:33 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
I've noticed that in this state most drivers don't stop for the pedestrians even at crosswalks (despite being required to by law), and if you stop, the driver behind you will honk and probably make an expressive gesture.
Sparky
4:12 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Note to all of those naysayers who were falsely accusing the Village Board and President of a hidden agenda...you were wrong. All along the Board was simply asking for community input on how to make Sussex a better place while concurrently planning for future growth. Thank you again to the entire Board for their open and transparent approach through this process.
Tony
10:31 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Remember to vote out Goetz and Dietrich in the next election. They are fake conservatives and signed the Walker recall.
Steve Dan
9:59 am on Sunday, May 20, 2012
While I don't agree with the whole recall fiasco, I do feel that all citizens have a right to vote their opinions whether in a leadership role or simply an American voicing their vote. The RAB idea is dead because we the people voiced our opinions. The board saw that and did what the people wanted. Quite simple actually. But if you don't like who or what candidate they voted for, then again, that is your right. You have no REASONABLE objection to vote them out of office. Don't you agree that it's a great thing to be able to vote, comment and endorse your personal opinion? I thank you for comments and your concern. You are indeed a needed American for standing up for your rights.
Cthlulu
9:30 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
This fiasco doesn't demonstrate "common sense" so much as a weak local government that is completely incapable of promoting the recommendations of experts for whose opinion the citizenry indirectly paid good money. The residents twenty years from now will be shaking their heads wondering what they had been thinking back then.