patching...
Update: Want more local coverage? "Like" us on Facebook and get Sussex Patch in your newsfeed! https://www.facebook.com/SussexPatch
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Letter to the Editor: Lynn Kristensen Reflects on the Election

Hamilton School Board member Lynn Kristensen writes to Patch explaining her post-election emotions, thoughts on Brian Schneider and signing the Gov. Scott Walker recall.

 

Dear Editor,

I want to say thank you to all those who supported me and provided encouragement. Their thoughtfulness has truly overwhelmed me. I feel good that we ran a clean campaign and focused on the issues that really matter to the Hamilton School District.

I appreciate the opportunity to state my side of the story and to clear the air in this matter now that the election is past. I was unwilling to engage in a war of words during the lead-up to the election - preferring to let my work speak for me. Unfortunately, the efforts of the opposition to smear my name were successful, that is something I regret.

The things that are being printed and said about me over the airwaves as "facts" are not true. I did sign the petition. I NEVER falsified or fraudulently signed my name on anything, at any time. The copies of the petition show a missed last letter - never intentional on my part. The reversal of the "r" and "i" are clearly a data entry error when it was input to the database.

The bottom line is that I made a mistake when ambushed by a bully.

My signature is valid and authentic, as is my address. I deeply resent the untruths being perpetuated as fact. They simply are wrong. Contrary to some statements - I've done nothing illegal.

The bottom line is that I made a mistake when ambushed by a bully. I think most people have experienced something like that in their life - being caught completely off-guard - but I'm guessing most haven't had to deal with their reaction being taped surreptitiously.

In the days before our conversation, Jeremy Halcomb left several messages at my home, asking to discuss issues of the school district, and that was what I was prepared to discuss with him. At no time did he indicate, in the messages he left, a question about my political philosophies. In my surprise, I responded poorly to his repeated questions about the recall petition during our initial conversation, out of fear and in an attempt to protect myself and my family.  

Upon reflection, my integrity led me to call him back to right my wrong the next day. Aside from my initial misstatement, I did nothing wrong. Isn't that what we teach our kids?

Everyone makes mistakes, and when you do, own it and make it right. I did that. While I'm not proud of the choice I made in that moment, I'm not ashamed of wanting to protect myself and my family and I am proud that I took corrective action. And clearly, my fears were well grounded - as the revelation of my personal political beliefs resulted in my complete character assassination in the media and has wreaked tremendous havoc on my family, in particular my children.

Everyone makes mistakes, and when you do, own it and make it right. I did that.

In my opinion, there is no room for partisan politics on a School Board. Take any issue that our district has faced since I've been on the Board.... at first blush, we may have seven different viewpoints of the issue. But through open dialogue, respectful sharing of ideas and truly listening to each other, we reach a consensus that we can support.  

That is how things get done - by showing respect for everyone's ideas and listening - really hearing - what everyone has to say. Just because you may disagree with someone on an issue doesn't mean that they're totally wrong or you're totally right. It's via open discussion, with trust, that you can actually gain new perspectives and get things accomplished. That is what we have been able to do during my years on the Board.

The district is at the top of its game. I am proud that I have been a part of that success. I would love to understand what needed "fixing" that inspired my detractors to plot to unseat me.

Few have questioned why someone who has never been involved or even supportive of the efforts in our schools or district suddenly pops up, endorsed by an entity with an exclusive focus on reducing taxes and supported by two men, Jeremy Halcomb and Steve Welcenbach, both of whom have chosen to send their own children to private schools outside the district. Personally, I question their motives. One has to wonder what the goals of such individuals are in a district that clearly is succeeding for all stakeholders.  

I would love to understand what needed "fixing" that inspired my detractors to plot to unseat me.

I am hopeful that this district will remain strong. We have an outstanding superintendent and administration, teachers and staff that are the best around and students hungry to learn and achieve. The Board works to be proactive and plan for the future. I wish the district good luck. I hope Mr. Schneider will be able to check his partisan politics at the door when he takes his oath of office.  

There is no room for a personal political agenda in representing ALL of the participants in this district.  I believe it is his charge to stand not only for the taxpayers, but just as strongly for students, parents, staff and the community at large. Balancing these elements is the key to a healthy, strong school system and has been the backbone of our success. I took that charge to heart and will always be proud of what we accomplished while I served this community for the past six years, both in terms of fiscal responsibility and student achievement.

Signed

Lynn Kristensen 

Related Topics: Brian Schneider, Elections, Hamilton School District, Jeremy Halcomb, Letter to the Editor, Lynn Kristensen, and Steve Welcenbach

Me in the Falls

2:50 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

I live in this district. I voted against you for one reason: you signed the petition. This means to me that you do not value Act 10 and the freedom it gives schools to restructure staffing as best suits the children.

You sound like you are playing the victim card in this letter. Holcomb and Welcenbach bullied you! Please! You were voted out because you signed and more of the voters thought better of renewing your contract because of it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark Hoppus

5:10 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

Halcomb and Welcenbach repeatedly called her and badgered her day and night. Halcomb even went so far as committing a crime by stuffing mailboxes in her neighborhood with a BS flyer. So yea, I think that classifies as "bullying." All you people don't realize that you are the new 21st Century Joe McCarthy's. Way to miss the message of this letter.

Comment_arrow

JD

7:29 am on Tuesday, April 10, 2012

I totally agree. Whether you spelled your name right or not is not the point. You signed a public record that shows me that do not support fiscal responsibility. That is why we voted you out.

Thomas Edwards

3:42 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

Exactly right Me in the Falls... That's why I voted against her!!

Reply

Steve ®

4:31 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

Bye bye Lynn. Keep lying to yourself
Good luck in the hunt for new employment, hope the new boss doesn't read the news

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark Hoppus

5:08 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

Man, Steve, you're so tough sitting behind you're computer and being all "patriotic." The fact that you don't even send your kids to school in the district says everything. You are a bully with a secret agenda. The fact that you and your crony Halcomb had to record a conversation is pretty stealthy. Lynn wrote a very positive and explanatory letter and you still resort to personal attacks on her. You set a great example for Erin and Ryan and your other daughter! I would really like you to answer her question- what needed "fixing" in the district? The school board raised taxes once, and that was only because the village demanded them to do so. Therefore, that can't be your excuse. On top of that, the district is one of the best in the state now. And, to top it all off, Brian Schneider cannot even vote on 95% of the votes that the school board has to make because of laws regarding him being the boss of his brother who teaches at Templeton. So, basically, Schneider will be sitting on the board, twiddling his thumbs and being an obstructionist. Good logic to me. And Steve, stay classy. Go rattle the saber at Marquette or DSHA.

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

8:49 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

Who the hell are Erin and Ryan? I don't have any kids and have no idea who all the rest of your gibberish is really intended for.

Comment_arrow

Luke

6:31 am on Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Steve<<<Who the hell are Erin and Ryan? I don't have any kids and have no idea who all the rest of your gibberish is really intended for.>>>

Apparently these people who are accusing others of a "witch hunt" are collecting all the information they can to smear the names of everyone they possibly can, because it would be wrong if you did so, but not if they did so.

Now they have some theory about us hanging out at the home of someone named Phil Ritter. I'm there right now with your three kids, along with Elvis, JFK and Amilia Earhart.

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

11:41 am on Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Say HI to Santa clause while your there for me. Give him a big shout " RECALL Santa: I didn't get what I wanted"

Tim

5:03 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

Very lame excuses. You signed the most partisan political document imaginable, and everyone knew the signatures were going to be made public. Most people don't lie went confronted with hard questions. You failed, and has an elected person, that is why you lost.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark Hoppus

5:09 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

Yea, Tim, people had no idea the signatures were going to be public because the GAB originally said they weren't. Get your facts straight. And I'm glad you totally missed Lynn's point in this letter. I feel sorry for you and how you have succumbed to McCarthyism. Stay classy yourself as well.

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

8:51 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

Last years recalls were public as well, which Lynn happen to sign, misspelling and all. They were debating on a searchable database not making them private. Thank you verify the recall for stepping up and getting the searchable database up so quickly.

Mark Hoppus

5:14 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

Do any of you have any idea the impact that this has had on her family? Put the whole "lying" and "signing the recall petition" issues aside. You think it is ok what these people did/are doing to her family? She has three children, and how do you think they are doing after the savage attacks launched on both her and her family as a whole? Put yourself in her shoes- if people went around slandering you and creating lie after lie after lie, how would you react? 99% of you wouldn't respond in manner she did- she sucked it up, didn't respond to smears, and then commented after the election with this classy letter. You are all hypocrites if you say otherwise. Think about her family, and think about how you would react if people attacked your family. Open your eyes people. This is a grade-A example of what made the nation so ashamed of Wisconsin back in the early 1950's- McCarthyism.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Luke

5:49 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

Mark,

I argee that the families of public figures suffer when they do wrong. I wish I could shield them from that. How many public figures have you observed doing things that you dislike?

Comment_arrow

highlightfilm

6:36 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

I am obviously naive to much of what went on behind the scenes to oust Lynn. Seems we're learning something new each day. While I have my differences with Lynn outside of politics, I am appreciative of how difficult this must have been to write for her. While some will accept her response and some won't, I'd personally like to see a cease to the piling on here. Lynn, Glenn, Andy, Bryan, and Noah have gone through enough.

Mark Hoppus

5:17 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

And one more thing. She DID run a clean campaign. Absolutely no one can deny that. Can Schneider and his cronies say that? Uh, no. Getting Mark Belling to slander her was real classy. I'd rather see someone run a clean campaign and lose than run a horrible, lie-drenched, slander-loving, dirty, stealthy, agenda-hidden campaign and win.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Luke

6:06 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

Mark,

<<<I'd rather see someone run a clean campaign and lose than run a horrible, lie-drenched, slander-loving, dirty, stealthy, agenda-hidden campaign and win.>>

Me too. Which is why when I ask someone a question, I would like an answer that is not a lie. Then I would like that person to try not to cover up their position or try to change the meaning of what was said. Nor would I like it if they then attacked me for sharing what they said. Such actions would not be part of a clean campaign.

Luke

5:44 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

Lynn said <<<Upon reflection, my integrity led me to call him back to right my wrong the next day. Aside from my initial misstatement, I did nothing wrong. Isn't that what we teach our kids?>>>

On the contrary, anyone who listens to the second phone call can immeditaly understand that the second phone call is also a lie. It is clear in the first phone call that you are answering the question by saying that you did not sign the petition. Yes, the reply was a "mistatement" of the truth, but it was not ambigious. Therefore the second call compounds the misdeed by trying to make statment something that it could never mean in the context.

In addition, the issue is not the signature, but the name written next to it. The data entered was not based upon the signature, but the printed name. As it is written on the document, the printed name has one letter omitted and two letters transposed.

These are some of my opinions.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark Hoppus

5:55 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

Luke, I wholeheartedly disagree with you, but I nonetheless respect what you just said and your viewpoint. Why? Because you stated at the end that it is your opinion. Not facts, but your opinions. Thank you for clarifying and not trying to pass your opinions off as facts. Hats off to you!

Comment_arrow

Craig

6:24 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

"It depends on what the definition of 'is' is"... sound familiar?
A Lie is a Lie is a Lie.
Once a Liar always a Liar.
Tp lay the victim card after playing the Liar card is laughable.

Me in the Falls

5:50 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

Ah, small town politics.
"this is what she did", "this is what he did". Nananananana.

Her signature on the recall says all that needs to be said about where she stands.

And everyone: people's kids are off limits. That goes for hers and it goes for those who have parents who have chosen a faith-based education. We ALL pay taxes for the school district we are in.

Reply

Luke

6:35 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

I just want to put this out there for people to think about. Below is a quote from Lynn's letter wherein she says that she made a choice that she is not proud of. What, exactly, was that choice? When did she correct it?

<<<While I'm not proud of the choice I made in that moment, >>>

I'm asking for the help of those who have opinions different than my own. What was the choice she made that she is not proud of?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rachel Holley Sciortino

8:16 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

Luke--Lynn is saying she is not proud she sated she did not sign the petition in the moment she was ambushed -- and she set it right the very next day when she called to tell Mr. Halcomb she did sign it.

Comment_arrow

Luke

8:51 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

Rachel commented:<<<Luke--Lynn is saying she is not proud she sated she did not sign the petition....- and she set it right the very next day when she called to tell Mr. Halcomb she did sign it.>>>

And when she called the next day to say that she did sign it, she said that "no" meant "No, I will not answer your question." So given your interpretation of Lynn's Letter to the Editor, exactly when did Lynn (according to her words) do this: "...my integrity led me to call him back to right my wrong the next day"?

My question is, Given her recorded response, and what she told the Sussex Sun (see excerpt below), when did she call and user her "integrity" to "right my wrong"? Here is what she told the Sussex Sun:

<<<According to both Halcomb and Kristensen, when she called back the next day, she admitted to signing the recall petition, and told Halcomb that she was caught off guard by his question. She also indicated that her "no" responses were meant to imply, "No, I'm not going to answer your question.">>>

According to you, Rachel, she only lied about not signing the petition. But according to her, she only said something that could be misunderstood. No one that has heard the recording will make the mistake of thinking that she was misunderstood. After all, she did put on quite an act about wanting to know who put her name on the ballot and how to seek justice. She wanted that evil doer to be flushed out an brought to justice.

Am I wrong?

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

8:55 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

That was a pretty long "moment" and the question was asked over and over and over again.

Comment_arrow

Luke

8:59 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012

Rachel, in case my last post what not clear, what I am getting at is that Lynn has yet to come public and state what you claim she is saying. If she ever does so, she will have to also say that she lied to reporters a couple of days later, because her statement is that she was only misunderstood.

Obviously she was not misunderstood. So when will be the first time her "integrity" leads her to do the right thing and tell us so?

Emily

1:06 am on Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Do you all realize that the election is over? If you still seriously need to sit behind your computers and continue to tear apart a woman over something that can no longer change, take a look at your lives. Does constantly beating down other people with no cause in sight make you feel better about yourself? Does this help you sleep at night? Does it make a positive influence on the community? Are you doing anything to change anything? No. You're simply sitting in a bath of filth and rolling around in it. Good luck keeping your heads above water with Schneider on school board now. My money's on you all regretting this vote a few years down the line. But until then, let this go. It's over. The elections happened. Lynn and her family has accepted this so everyone else should as well. Let's all let the Kristensen's get back to their normal lives, and go find some other innocent person's life to ruin.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Luke

6:21 am on Tuesday, April 10, 2012

@Emily

<<<Do you all realize that the election is over? >>>

Yes.

<<<If you still seriously need to sit behind your computers and continue to tear apart a woman over something that can no longer change, take a look at your lives. Does constantly beating down other people with no cause in sight make you feel better about yourself?..... No. You're simply sitting in a bath of filth and rolling around in it.>>>

Umm, in case you missed it, this thread is in response to Lynn's letter. She is the one who wrote it. She made some veiled reference to having done the right thing to showcase her integrity in some untenable, mysterious way. And it case you missed it, she called someone a bully and ASKED why someone would feel the need to do what they did. She said that she was ambushed by some simple questions. Talk about calling people names and rolling around in filth....!!

Seriously, if any public figure in this state was approached and was asked some simple questions and they gave untruthful responses and were suspected of signing false names on documents, it would most certainly have made the news.

<<<Good luck keeping your heads above water with Schneider on school board now.>>>

A little hypocritical of you, smearing his name.

<<< Lynn and her family has accepted this...>>>

No, they haven't.

<<< and go find some other innocent person's life to ruin.>>>

"other" implies that we've found one already.

Comment_arrow

Emily

9:06 am on Tuesday, April 10, 2012

If I was thrown out of an office I deserved I'd ask why people were doing this as well! And not the constituents-though I believe your reasoning is ridiculous, you've made it very clear why you voted her out (even pointlessly after the election is over). She wants to know why Mr. Schneider-as opposed to anyone else-wanted this position. What did she do while on the board to deserve to be kicked off? What will he be bringing to the school board? As Mark Hoppus said above-he can't even vote 95% of the time because of his brother. Seems like he'll be doing a lot of good. At least she fessed up when she made a mistake. She could have taken the lie farther, pretended it wasn't her and spiraled the whole things out of control. But of course she wouldn't do that. She fessed up and admitted her wrongdoing. A commendable action when you know your livlihood is on the line. I'm not doing any smearing. The elections over and I said nothing bad against the man. But simply-good luck. Karma hurts sometimes. Her family has accepted it-do you see them campaigning any more? This letter is proof that she accepts what happened. And yes, you have temporarily 'ruined' the Kristensen family. Luckily they're strong and will get up keep moving forward to do something good for the world.

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

11:49 am on Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Well since this letter was posted April 9th, yesterday, and I was out on vacation all last week I'd say these comments are pretty relevant Emily. Nice of you to show up.

I can answer some of these for ya

►Do you all realize that the election is over?◄
Yep, I have a calender.

► over something that can no longer change◄
Yep, recall signatures are public data forever.

►Does constantly beating down other people with no cause in sight make you feel better about yourself?◄
A public official caught in these lies and signing an unpopular recall will receive public reaction. Welcome to the internet enjoy your stay.

►Does this help you sleep at night?◄
I don't have an issue with falling asleep

►Does it make a positive influence on the community?◄
Yes

►Are you doing anything to change anything?◄
Yep, voted. Thanks to this many had a clear informed vote this time around about your friend Lynn.

Comment_arrow

Emily

12:45 pm on Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Good job missing the entire point of what I said. Props to you.

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

2:47 pm on Tuesday, April 10, 2012

I got the point. You supported Lynn, defended her lies, got caught defending her actions when all the facts were made clear and now you want this all to be swept under the rug as fast as possible.

It's politics. Max two week lifespan

Comment_arrow

Luke

3:18 pm on Tuesday, April 10, 2012

@Emily

<<<At least she fessed up when she made a mistake. .>>>

She told another lie, And then she went to the papers and told them a lie. No one that supports her can make a defense that makes sense of what she is saying, and they don't claim that they can.

<<<She could have taken the lie farther, pretended it wasn't her and spiraled the whole things out of control>>>

That's exactly what she did. Shall we go back over the facts?

Comment_arrow

Emily

11:04 pm on Tuesday, April 10, 2012

I didn't 'get caught' doing anything. I'll admit to anyone that I supported her, and basically everyone that knows me knows I did. I'm not trying to sweep anything under a rug. I'm just honestly confused as to why this banter is continuing after the fact of the election. At this point you're just talking to hear yourself talk, because what's coming out of your mouth can have no impact on the future. and Luke, these 'facts' you want to go back over, aren't real facts. do i want to go over your opinions again? no. you've made your point very clear, and i respect it as an opinion.

Comment_arrow

Luke

6:19 am on Wednesday, April 11, 2012

@Emily

<<<. I'm just honestly confused as to why this banter is continuing after the fact of the election.>>>

Maybe it's because the Letter To The Editor above was posted 48 hours ago, because Lynn wanted us to see it. Ya think?

<<< and Luke, these 'facts' you want to go back over, aren't real facts. do i want to go over your opinions again?.>>>

No, we can go over LYNN'S opinions again. You said that she lied once and corrected it. Yet no one that has heard the recordings will step up and defend what she said to the Sussex Sun as truth (not to mention the lie in the second phone call), because it is obvious to her most ardent defenders that she told the reporter yet another lie. Not even ONE single person has come forward and attempted to make sense of that glaring problem. It is so obvious and clear that I fear that some people may gouge out their eyes and ears to avoid seeing it and hearing it.

MSo32

9:39 am on Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Steve

Hey Steve Welcenbach....do you really need to trademark your name? Oh, I get it...that's so when you forget it you'll know where to go....nice flag too

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve ®

11:43 am on Tuesday, April 10, 2012

I'm not Steve Welcenbach and have no idea who he is. You guys need to lay off the kool aid.

I am the 1%, we do that kind of stuff

Tony

2:56 pm on Tuesday, April 10, 2012

"Its not a lie if you believe it" - George Kastanza

Reply

MSo32

6:45 pm on Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Nice denial Welcenbach, stay tuned, I'm sure your kids are proud of the mad scientist

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve ®

8:51 am on Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Thank you. Since I am not who your crazy head thinks I am it was pretty easy to come up with.

LAtwater

10:25 pm on Tuesday, April 10, 2012

The liberal playbook on full display 1) When caught, deny even in the face of irrefutable evidence 2) Play the victim card 3) Try to deflect by attacking your opponent (Alinsky) 4) Claim a vast, right-wing conspiracy is out to get you.

Reply

Menoparent

9:10 am on Wednesday, April 11, 2012

I am in the Falls school district, I find this talk here against her to be personally hateful towards her and her family. She was right in wanting to protect her family. If you want to vote her out because she signed the recall, fine, but don't bully her and slander her like she committed a crime. I've seen this in our own district even when they didn't misspell their name.

This is why it's so crazy to publish this recall list to the public and to even allow someone to lookup someone by name too! Many will be discriminated against for this not only in an election but it's privacy, you know their name and address!

I really felt for Kristenten when I first read this article after the election night and I really feel the hate and anger from the other side will only prove to be on the wrong side eventually.

Whatever happened to voting respectfully without slandering.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve ®

10:39 am on Friday, April 20, 2012

►but it's privacy, you know their name and address!◄

ever herd of the white pages?

Comment_arrow

Bert

1:47 pm on Wednesday, April 11, 2012

These clowns all think they're mini-Limbaughs. They all think that it's OK to (anonymously) de-humanize and say utterly despicable things about their neighbors, because they hear Rush do it. Their ring leader Belling called one of the MF school board members a "whore" on his radio show. The lemmings on this board jumped right in with the name-calling on these boards. There's not a thinking brain among them. It's all the same garbage, regurgitated every time. They have no concept of respecting their own neighbors, respecting the work people do in the community. Most of them have no idea what it is they're even angry about. (Note - not one of the lemmings ever could answer my question about what specifically in the dreaded MF teacher's contract they didn't like - I doubt a single one read it. But, achieving all of the financial benefits of Act 10 without actually shoving done teachers' throats just wasn't good enough for some).

But, not to worry. When these people see those of us with different opinions than they at Pick N Save or at the LL Complex, they'll smile and say nice things, pretending not to be the hate-filled nut jobs they really are.

Comment_arrow

Craig

8:15 pm on Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Bert you are being an idiot again. I as well as others answered your questions. You either can not read well enough to know it, or you chose to ignore it.
I do not listen to Rush or Belling. But I agree with Belling regarding the MFSB member.

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

8:53 am on Thursday, April 12, 2012

► but it's privacy, you know their name and address! ◄

ever herd of the white pages?

Luke

3:19 pm on Wednesday, April 11, 2012

@Menoparent

<<<Whatever happened to voting respectfully without slandering.>>>

Slandering involves saying something false about somone. Lynn went public to the Sussex Sun and told a story. When the story went public the recordings of the actual conversation went public. Now there isn't a single person left that will defend her comments to the Sun as truth.

There is no slander. People are just pointing out the obvious to other people who are being selective regarding what they are paying attention to. The irony is that Lynn took this opportunity to take another shot at the reputations of other people while scolding them for doing the same . But those people told the truth.

What I've been observing is that people who defend her keep talking about feelings, but not the facts. You have every right to vote according to your feelings without regard to the facts.. Others will let the facts guide their feelings.

End of story.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Luke

7:15 pm on Wednesday, April 11, 2012

One more thing.......EVERYONE involved has kids. Think about that.

LAtwater

7:35 pm on Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Luke - you are spot on. The only slander here is coming from Lynn. She attacks Schneider, his involvement in the schools and his 'partisan politics', but has she even talked to him about these things. I doubt it.

She calls Halcomb a 'bully' who 'ambushed' her, but if you listen to the call he basically just asks her three questions and really is quite amicable throughout the call. She goes on to attack him and Welcenbach because they don't have kids in the district schools, as if that should somehow disqualify them from being involved. So basically she smears her 'opponents' - hypocritically engaging in the very behavior she bemoans.

And to top it off, she continues to be dishonest, talking about data entry errors and her signature when it was her PRINTED name on TWO petitions. And she doesn't even address why she signed the Darling petition when she didn't live in Darling's district (which I believe is a crime).

It's to the point where it appears Lynn is disconnected from reality, still not realizing that the tapes of the phone calls and the actual petitions she wrote on are available for all to see and hear. Maybe Lynn should go listen to the calls and look at the petitions herself - it might help to cut through the fog of rationalization she has created for herself, help her come to grips with her actual behavior, and then move on with her life.

Reply

MSo32

10:31 pm on Thursday, April 12, 2012

Luke

Don't you have a brother who has a record

Reply
Comment_arrow

Luke

12:47 am on Friday, April 13, 2012

@MSo32

<<<Don't you have a brother who has a record>>>

Perhaps in his attic. But when CDs came out he probably got rid of them. He really doesn't listen to much music these days, so I doubt that he uses an MP3 player.

Sue Faust

11:07 pm on Thursday, April 12, 2012

Oh my goodness...this stuff is better than reality tv. Are ALL small town publications like this. You are actually trying to guess each others identities, "out" each other's children and besmirch each others families. WOW. Note to self...NEVER express an opinion on this board!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Luke

12:48 am on Friday, April 13, 2012

Relax. It's like being chased by the Keystone Cops. (I hope you are old enough to appreciate the reference.)

Comment_arrow

Luke

1:04 am on Friday, April 13, 2012

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keystone_Cops

Scroll down to the "In popular culture" section.

Leave a comment